Відео

What do you guys think the motivation is, for who ever is pulling these strings, to have these climate alarmists try to achieve these wild goals? I can’t help but feel there is something sinister at play.

As for the latter years, I took PSSC Physics in high school and it was excellent and inspirational. Not only were the curriculum and lab experiments great, but I also had a knowledgeable teacher too who had a physics degree.

I still typewrite and do modern-day typewriting called keyboarding with all fingers and right thumb on the keys and spacebar, without bowing down my head. Your history is very in-depth.👍

The politics here in the US is a complete mess. No one knows the difference between right wing and left wing. I've spent the past two months deep diving into this topic, trying to wrap my head around it. I find that for the most part, this stuff is being pushed by progressive liberals. By and large the resistance is coming from conservatives. However, the actual Marxists are also standing up to this stuff with better analysis in most cases. But the conservatives in the US have been on this long trip of anti-intellectualism so they have this tendency to call anyone they disagree with a Marxist. Yet, in this matter, and humorously many other topics, the Marxists are in line with the conservatives. But these groups will never speak to each other. Marxists care about class politics, they tend to be wary of racial and identity politics. But the conservatives think the critical race theorists are Marxists, they also think Democrats are Marxists along with other such ridiculous things. So, creating a unified front is essentially impossible. The actual liberals here are too scared of being labeled racist to make a stand. It feels pretty hopeless.

This stuff is hitting my school district this year. I spent all year doing equity modules based around Kendi's work and honestly, I was mostly just impressed that the conversation had made it this far. It wasn't until I saw how they were trying to bring this into the math classrooms that I had to pause and really think because something is definitely off here. Firstly, as a Phd in mathematics I'm a bit flustered by how often teachers are taking notes from people who really know almost nothing about mathematics, if I had to summarize the general problem with math education today this would be it. For 30 years teachers have been taking notes from anyone and everyone aside from actual content experts, and it shows. This is a great example of people who know almost nothing about math trying to tell teachers how to math, smdh. Kendi's premise which makes this entire conversation possible is the idea that everything is racist, thus one has only two choices, being racist or being antiracist. This is a typical ideological mind trap. It is designed to relieve people of the strain of having to actually think. This is the same logic used by George Bush when he said, you either support America or you support the terrorists. In politics these statements are used as polarization and to detract non-partisanship. When used as a conclusion, especially when presenting a false dichotomy then it becomes an informal fallacy. These are called thought-terminating cliches in analytic philosophy. I suspect this is why we see so few liberals standing up to this because they cannot afford to be labeled racist etc. But these false binary mechanisms of control are a true hallmark of white supremacy culture. Just look at all the work that has been done around gender for instance. This brings me to what I personally see as one of the most ridiculous aspects of this book. When presenting a list of ways in which white supremacy culture shows up in a math classroom the first thing at the top of this list is, the focus on getting the right answer. There are two things wrong here. Firstly, they just suckered us all into agreeing with them or else be labeled a racist with a false dichotomy that we are not even allowed to question, hypocrisy. Secondly, the focus on getting the right answer has nothing to do at all with some ideological pigeonhole along the political spectrum. The focus on getting the right answer has more to do with graduating people who become civil engineers who can build a bridge without killing thousands of people. Mathematics as a whole is a subject which entirely predates colonialism and the modern notions of both whiteness and blackness that became the predominant modes of society. So, while the institutions of education can certainly have remnants of the culture of white supremacy, the idea that the subject itself is racist is just silly. These conclusions could only be made by someone who barely knows anything about mathematics or its history. To be clear, these education majors, generally speaking, are about 5 community college math classes above any of their students. Yet, they all tell themselves they are as qualified as a mathematician to speak on mathematics, this isn't true. The story of mathematics is already one of the most multicultural stories of all the subjects of classic academia. In fact, Europeans were super late to the table. It was the colonization of the Iberian Peninsula by the Moors which brough modern math to Europe which still took literally hundreds of years to catch on. White people do not own this story. These are the facts. One last tidbit to consider, if math itself is racist, then why does every non-white country in the entire world do much better at math than the United States? For 30 years now education majors have been excluding content experts. Everything they have sold us has failed. We as a country have been in a heated debate over whether to allow middle school kids to learn Algebra, while every other country in the world has the kids doing Calculus in middle school. After a while it starts to look like these teachers will do anything but learn more math. This equity thing is just the new current trendy teacher buzz word being used to market and sell curriculum. It is yet another distraction from the fact we need actual content experts in public curriculum.

I do not understand why Mr. Mills keeps say there is no Energy Revolution going on. By far new generation capacity is renewable energy. The price of batteries and solar PV panels have significantly declined. The revolution will be the creation of a power grid based on battery storage and renewable energy. Mr. Mills is selling the past.

Thank you both for a highly informative and rigorous dialogue. I so hope half our population at least, will hear and understand.

' hash tag GET OVER IT, NO DEBATE ', SMELLS OF ISLAMB; IS LAMB ,,,? OH YES, PART OF A PLAN

So the National Association of Scholars is a place for washed up and outdated bigots. England is certainly a failing nation with Dr. Who and bigotry being the only cultural exports left. Sorry that trans people exist, but yall are not being discriminated for your beliefs. The majority of people accept us and our rights to exist, no wonder your colleagues have abandoned you, they must feel terribly sad for you.

Old testament - Trial by water. Trial by fire Wheel fire - Addie as centre of wheel 59 - close to 60 mins in an hour Madness of darl - platonic divine Punishment of darl is collective punishment over personal values (especially if darl heard Addie say to burn). Addie as christ/fish - she continues to influence after she is dead

I enjoyed this talk so much. Thank you! I am currently reading AOI and savoring it.

"What do the Trans community need most right now? Abigail Thorn & Freddy McConnell | Pod Save The UK" 12:25 : PhilosophyTube/"Abigail": "Even the way that they have reified biological sex, as if, like, that's an objective fact that's, like, discovered and not something that's assigned like. Like, a lot of people are still like 'well you can't change sex but you can change gender', I say, no, actually clearly you can, I have."

I think “gender critical” is a flawed term, because it suggests skepticism about the existence of gender. The distinction between “sex”, “gender”, “transgender” and “gender identity” is crucial to this debate, and we need to be really clear about what we mean. “Gender identity skeptical” or “transgender critical” would seem more accurate terminology.

Gay men being encouraged to believe that they are really straight women. Straight women being encouraged to believe that they are really gay men. Lesbians being encouraged to believe that they are really straight men. Straight men being encouraged to believe that they are really lesbians. It’s Upside Down World.

A good reasoning conversation is healthy. Even the therapists Tom Anderson and Jaakko Seikkula showed us its healing potential through Open Dialogue. There are many other examples, in peace negotiations, socratic dialogue etc. The basis is respect. It may not always be possible, when the opponent is just playing power gamles, and does not adhere to common reality experience.

Katleen Stock nails it again. A real star.

Great interview. Thanks Kathleen for all you do.

I would use the word pinical rather than ultimate, in my opinion. May be understood easier to lay people.

❤

Can u be trans without being sexist? I dont think its logically possible. Do trans people not realise how sexist they are

Office space 2.0!

She is great. Really did not deserve to be hounded out of her job by silly little bullies

As a U. S. citizen, I wonder what kind of changes we would see in attitudes if we just make all bathrooms gender neutral. I don't see the big deal if I as a man have to share a space with women. On the other hand, I don't see why a person who has gone through male puberty should compete against women who have not and are obviously disadvantaged. This position to allow people to do this is an example of how the radicals will not give an inch, no matter how sensible.

I keep hearing the guys's breath. He should turn off his mic when listening

When the fascists you are in bed with are done with the shameful allyship you provide, they will come for you too. No one is free until we are all free.

If judith butler had a brain..... I know.... I don"care 😅

PTSD -, great Gatsby ww1 (you can recreate the past)

Sadly they don't post any sources. It's like listening to snake oil salesman smeared by big oil.

Wonderful~ than you both so much! I enjoy listening to the most dashing gent with or without a pink wig. Appreciate NSA hosting such high quality guests, that remind us of the value of serious play and seeking Life

Today I identify as a trans aardvark called Fifi-Trixibelle🦒. Stop oppressing me😡

Truth unmasks fallacy and Evidence is it's proof. Reality heeds no fantasy while Facts uncloak all spoof. Sanity! Our Sanity! Oh, let us Save Our Selves FROM OURSELVES!! Darryl Daniel Powell

This is shocking!!! “Hannah Tubbs 26 year old male sex offender is sentence to a youth female correction facility. A Los Angeles County judge on Jan. 27 ordered Hannah Tubbs, a 26 year old male-to-female transgender Californian, to serve two years in a juvenile detention facility after Tubbs pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl in 2014 - but it's possible Tubbs could only face six months.” He doesn’t appear to have had sex reassignment surgery. Can you even wrap your mind around that?

Right Xi, this should be a required course in schools across these United States.

Thank you, Doctor Stock. As usual, you cogently make sense of the insanity that is occurring all over the world.

Very nice interview! Just a shame the audio isn't better.

why are my responses being deleted? Stock calls for the right to be offensive, makes commentary such as trans having fake identities and analogies with radical examples of prison rape; which is supporting bullying behaviors in education - as she makes education an unsafe space because of how she frames a conversation. Lastly Stock makes no attempt at a valid or sound philosophical argument about what a women is; if she did she would not have said the things she has or found new learning; Stock's philosophy is rubbish. Personally I think Stock has issues with men and makes no criticism of trans men as a result...

Utterly disingenuous to mock the sex switching fish as this isn't intended to be a direct comparison with humans but as a simplistic retort to those who simplistically claim sex is strictly binary throughout ALL biology. It's a challenge to rigid thinking.

Volume is too different.

Sexologist like thinking tends genuinely quite easily go off the deep end

A lot more people might agree with her if “moral defect as the only explanation for dissent” had not been the go-to tactic of feminism since it began.

The treatment of Stock is appalling but its roots come from within feminism itself and other academic victim "studies" who have an equally apalling history of witch hunting against their "enemies" such as men, white people, straight society etc.

To suggest that within the Cass report there is evidence that puberty blockers hardly ever work is grossly misleading.there are far more reports of the benefits that puberty blockers provide to truly gender challenged children…but I guess that any thing that does not support your argument needs to be swept aside with terms like well we all know xyz .quite frustrating to hear a one sided dissertation with flimsy arguments based on gross misrepresentations formed in a mist of anti trans rhetoric.

If terf fits then ……it is what it is!

I would never have suspected that academia was so full of downright idiots and moral cowards. Who in their right mind other than misogynists thinks that men hell bent on ruining womens sports deserve respect. Cheats and bullies and invaders of women's privacy. So the bull is the same as the cow to Judith Butler. She should get in a field with both and learn something for the sake of the godess.

This is nonsense from start to finish

Hello, At minute 31, to the argument, "we've just made-up sex. Sex is in no way real or unalterable, I would separate out real from unalterable. It's entirely the case that people alter things that should be left untouched. Pristine waters are good for life. They're horribly polluted. Such examples can be given seemingly endlessly. My point of practice is: wouldn't the amazing body itself know better than a hubristic surgeon or pill peddler?

Sorry, Dr Curry, I’m not really convinced by your conversion from alarmist to denier. You’re at least a climate realist who takes pains to try to sound moderate and keep a foot in each camp. In my humble opinion, I think that your position is untenable. This “climate change” fiasco is actually not about the climate. Many scientists and even deniers fail to grasp this and continue to engage the “alarmists” at the technical level at their game and your (sincere) attempt to contribute to solutions is admirable but misguided because you have fallen into their trap of distraction. Intelligent people with a scientific background can easily understand climate “science” data. Yes, climate is complex, but all data must be honest and conform to logic and common sense. The thick reams of IPCC reports are there to occupy and exhaust authentic scientists like you. If you could wake up, you’ll realise that the climate alarmism is just a pretence and an excuse for militant environmentalists to take over political control of the world. The truth is climate cannot be controlled nor predicted by humans. Yes, you can study climate but it is to better prepare us to adapt to natural periodic extreme weather. The duty of climate “scientists” is not to make wild predictions or collude with politicians to implement irresponsible policies to impoverish the world and sabotage human civilisation. Yes, we can find better solutions to secure our energy needs but that has nothing to do with the climate. Please give more credit to the intelligent sector of the public. Yes, you are right. The global warming hypothesis is an utterly stupid proposition which right-thinking people shouldn’t have spent more than 2 minutes to see through. It shouldn’t take decades for us to realise that the IPCC and their sponsors are pretending to be stupid just to commit fraud. Sorry if I sound rude, but I’m not.

I think your all far too right winged in thinking and cant accept freedom... Whats it matter if a person desires and undergoes a transitition: why are you so venomously opposed? Stock was the target of students protests, because of the vile things she said, she made education an unsafe space - and it is a shame none of you understand this? You can't call all trans people rapists, delusionary, fake identities and etc as a lecturer in education because you will lead on bullying behaviours or worse...

This just showed up. ua-cam.com/video/E425kVLEieM/v-deo.htmlsi=U2j46nGyruCjmTj4

Amy Wax is a wonderful woman.